Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Caucawhatsit?

Twice this week - once on the radio and once in a magazine article - I've heard people refer to "Caucasian" as a race. Please please can we throw this term - and all attached to it like Negroid & Mongoloid - to the ground?

The term "Caucasian" originated in the 19th century when physical anthropologists (remember, anthropology at this time was a newish academic discipline born when the colonizers wanted to study the colonized - Europeans studying Africans, Asians, Indians, etc. - and needed something to differentiate them from us so while sociology could continue to be the study of ourselves (white on white) anthropology became the study of the other) tried to find a way to define different types of people/races based on the shape and size of their head. Yup, race as skull bumps, nose bends and chin juts. "Caucasian" comes from Mount Caucasus in what is now, I believe, Russia and was used because some British folks at that time thought the people who lived on Mount Caucasus were particularly beautiful - in a light-skinned, thin-nosed, small-lipped way. The same folks who brought us "Caucasian" to describe Europeans (and people from the Indian subcontinent due to the Sanskrit-Aryan connection) also cited Mount Caucasus as the origin of all human life on earth. They believed it started with all us light-skinned, thin-nosed, small-lipped white people. Poor folks, what would they have done with tiny dark Lucy, the mother of us all?

I'm not sure why some folks still use "Caucasian" to describe white folks, other than its what they learned. I've heard some people talk about white people as "Europeans" in a way to distinguish us without using the politicized idea of "white" but, since Europeans in 2007 are dark-skinned, olive-skinned, snow-skinned and so on down the line, that isn't accurate either.

For me, "white" is what we have, however inadequate that is. But then, that's the problem with race. It doesn't exist. There is no real difference between individuals based on skin color, facial features, hair texture, or body type. It's the systems we've created that exist - racism, white supremacy, etc. And to try and talk about us individual bodies impacted by and propping up these systems, we have to use this largely ineffectual language.

But please, not "Caucasian" anymore.

4 comments:

Emptyman said...

Do you say "black" or "African American"?

Susan said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Astrodon Johnstoni said...

I give this speech too sometimes. Caucasian is just a totally useless term that carries all this baggage. And furthermore, it is just a smartypants word. As an English major and a lawyer, I just feel like words are so awesome, but you have to use your powers for good.

Anonymous said...

Hmm, amazing .. I only write in white .. and that even bothers me! Cause I am pinkish .. depending on the season of the year .. we should define who we are more by our culture, but even then that is difficult ... what am i?? Only the universe really knows ....

But defining oneself, at times, doers have value ...

K